Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,097 questions · 1,119 findings · 70 reviews · Kidney and Transplant

No studies found 271 · 24.2%GRADE not reported 17 · 1.5%Very low 271 · 24.2%Low 349 · 31.2%Moderate 182 · 16.3%High 29 · 2.6%

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Death (all causes) · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in death (all causes) compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Graft loss (censored) · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in graft loss (censored) compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

Death (all causes) · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in death (all causes) compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Biopsy‐proven acute rejection · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in biopsy‐proven acute rejection compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

CMV infection · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to lower CMV infection compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Wound complications · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to higher adverse wound outcomes: all complications compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

All malignancies · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in all malignancies compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Number needing to change treatment · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to higher number needing to change treatment compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: secondary outcomes

New onset of diabetes · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to higher new‐onset diabetes mellitus compared with antimetabolites: secondary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: secondary outcomes

BK virus infection · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) leads to lower BK virus infection compared with antimetabolites: secondary outcomes (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: secondary outcomes

Hypercholesterolaemia · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) may leads to higher hypercholesterolaemia compared with antimetabolites: secondary outcomes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

Graft loss censored for death · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in graft loss censored for death compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: secondary outcomes

Hypertriglyceridaemia · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to higher hypertriglyceridaemia compared with antimetabolites: secondary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: secondary outcomes

Leucopenia · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) may leads to lower leucopenia compared with antimetabolites: secondary outcomes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: secondary outcomes

Thrombocytopenia · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) may leads to higher thrombocytopenia compared with antimetabolites: secondary outcomes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review