What do systematic reviews say?

Rifampicin plus pyrazinamide vs isoniazid

It is very uncertain whether rifampicin plus pyrazinamide changes active TB: compared with isoniazid (very low certainty).

• Rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine) compared to isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in HIV‐negative… 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.32 [0.42, 4.13]
  2 studies · 176 participants
  Very low

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 275 participants
  Low

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 921 participants
  Low
• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.96 [0.71, 1.28]
  3 studies · 790 participants
  Very low

Active information provision vs control

It is very uncertain whether active information provision changes depression (cases) compared with control (very low certainty).

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.64, 1.5]
  3 studies · 843 participants
  Very low

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 924 participants
  Low

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 91 participants
  Low

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 91 participants
  Low

Active information provision vs control

Active information provision showed no clear difference in anxiety (cases) compared with control (low certainty).

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.85 [0.68, 1.06]
  5 studies · 1132 participants
  Low
• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 1171 participants
  Low

Active information provision vs control

Active information provision showed no clear difference in depression (cases) compared with control (low certainty).

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.83 [0.68, 1.01]
  6 studies · 1315 participants
  Low

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  8 studies · 1405 participants
  Moderate

Active information provision vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 60 participants
  Low

Active information provision vs control

• Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 356 participants
  Very low

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

• Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  478 participants
  Very low

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

• Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 63 participants
  Low