Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,747 questions · 3,943 findings · 594 reviews

No studies found 784 · 19.9%GRADE not reported 530 · 13.4%Very low 1,040 · 26.4%Low 981 · 24.9%Moderate 444 · 11.3%High 164 · 4.2%

Intervention not reported

Case cross‐over ‐ Jeryl Lynn or Rubini · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in case cross‐over ‐ Jeryl Lynn or Rubini (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series ‐ any strain · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher self‐controlled case series ‐ any strain (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series ‐ Urabe · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher self‐controlled case series ‐ Urabe (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self controlled case series ‐ Leningrad‐Zagreb · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in self controlled case series ‐ Leningrad‐Zagreb (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies household contacts ‐ 3 doses · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to lower cohort studies household contacts ‐ 3 doses (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Person‐time cohort ‐ Jeryl Lynn · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in person‐time cohort ‐ Jeryl Lynn (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Case‐only ecological method ‐ Urabe · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher case‐only ecological method ‐ Urabe (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Case‐only ecological method ‐ Leningrad‐Zagreb · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher case‐only ecological method ‐ Leningrad‐Zagreb (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies ‐ within 1 week after MMR vaccination · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention probably leads to higher cohort studies ‐ within 1 week after MMR vaccination (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks after MMR vaccination · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention probably leads to higher cohort studies ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks after MMR vaccination (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies ‐ > 2 weeks after MMR vaccination · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in cohort studies ‐ > 2 weeks after MMR vaccination (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks after MMR vaccination · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ > 2 weeks after MMR vaccination · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ > 2 weeks after MMR… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks after vaccination; MMRV · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks after MMR+V vaccination · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher self‐controlled case series/person‐time ‐ between 1 and 2 weeks… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies postexposure prophylaxis · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to lower cohort studies postexposure prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 0 to 42 days after vaccination (Priorix‐Tetra) · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 0 to 42 days after vaccination… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 7 to 10 days after vaccination (Priorix‐Tetra) · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 7 to 10 days after vaccination… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 0 to 42 days after vaccination (ProQuad) · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 0 to 42 days after vaccination… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 7 to 10 days after vaccination (ProQuad) · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to higher MMRV vs MMR+V ‐ by brand ‐ from 7 to 10 days after vaccination… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review