Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,783 questions · 10,022 findings · 882 reviews

No studies found 2,100 · 21%GRADE not reported 1,013 · 10.1%Very low 2,237 · 22.3%Low 2,514 · 25.1%Moderate 1,709 · 17.1%High 449 · 4.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Ototoxicity according to Brock criteria with intravenous platinum (combined asymptomatic and symptomatic disease) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate probably leads to lower ototoxicity according to Brock criteria with intravenous platinum… compared with no otoprotective intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Overall survival with intravenous platinum (i.e. mortality/number of participants deceased) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate showed no clear difference in overall survival with intravenous platinum (i.e. mortality/number of… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Event‐free survival · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate showed no clear difference in event‐free survival with intravenous platinum (i.e. number of… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Tumour response with intravenous platinum (complete and partial remission) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate showed no clear difference in tumour response with intravenous platinum (complete and partial… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no otoprotective intervention

Ototoxicity according to NCI CTC v2 criteria with intravenous platinum (combined asymptomatic and symptomatic disease) Objective and subjective audiometric evaluations were performed, no further information provided · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Amifostine showed no clear difference in ototoxicity according to NCICTCv2 criteria with intravenous platinum… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no otoprotective intervention

Ototoxicity according to modified Brock criteria with intravenous platinum (combined asymptomatic and symptomatic disease) Audiograms were performed, but no further information provided · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Amifostine showed no clear difference in ototoxicity according to modified Brock criteria with intravenous… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no otoprotective intervention

Tumour response with intra‐arterial platinum (good and partial remission) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Amifostine showed no clear difference in tumour response with intra‐arterial platinum (good and partial… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI/SNRI) with mirtazapine (30 mg/d) vs augmentation of current antidepressant (various) with placebo

Leaving the study early · treatment‐resistant depression in adults

Augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI/SNRI) with mirtazapine… showed no clear difference in dropouts compared with augmentation of current antidepressant (SSRI/SNRI) therapy with… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review