Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,886 questions in 74 reviews · Skin

current versions
No studies 542 · 28.7%Ungraded 130 · 6.9%Very low 326 · 17.3%Low 434 · 23%Moderate 348 · 18.5%High 106 · 5.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Corticosteroid creams/ointments: mometasone furoate cream 3 times/week vs 2 times/week
Primary: investigator‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms · people (all patch‐tested) with hand eczema > 6 months that had cleared upon daily treatment for a maximum of 9 weeks…
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.23 [0.94, 1.61]1 study · 72 participantsLow
Corticosteroid creams/ointments: mometasone furoate cream 3 times/week vs 2 times/week
Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms Not measured · people (all patch‐tested) with hand eczema > 6 months that had cleared upon daily treatment for a maximum of 9 weeks…
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Corticosteroid creams/ointments: mometasone furoate cream 3 times/week vs 2 times/week
Primary: adverse events · people (all patch‐tested) with hand eczema > 6 months that had cleared upon daily treatment for a maximum of 9 weeks…
Interventions for hand eczema (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.76 [0.45, 6.83]1 study · 72 participantsLow
Oral methotrexate and oral prednisone vs placebo and oral prednisone
Primary outcome: Global improvement of disease activity or damage assessed by a medical practitioner or by participants · children and adolescents with active morphea (linear scleroderma, generalised morphea and mixed subtype: linear and…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 2.31 [1.2, 4.45]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²)
Primary outcome: Adverse effects · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.03 [0, 0.42]1 study · 35 participantsLow
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (skin softening) · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 28 participantsLow
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Primary outcome: Global improvement of disease activity or damage assessed by a medical practitioner or by participants · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 45 participantsLow
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Primary outcome: Adverse effects · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.03 [0, 0.41]1 study · 45 participantsLow
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (skin softening) · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral methotrexate and oral prednisone vs placebo and oral prednisone
Primary outcome: Adverse effects · children and adolescents with active morphea (linear scleroderma, generalised morphea and mixed subtype: linear and…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.23 [0.75, 2.04]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Oral methotrexate and oral prednisone vs placebo and oral prednisone
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (reduction in lesion size) · children and adolescents with active morphea (linear scleroderma, generalised morphea and mixed subtype: linear and…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsLow
Oral methotrexate and oral prednisone vs placebo and oral prednisone
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage · children and adolescents with active morphea (linear scleroderma, generalised morphea and mixed subtype: linear and…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsUngraded
Medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²) vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Primary outcome: Global improvement of disease activity or damage assessed by a medical practitioner or by participants · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsLow
Medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²) vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Primary outcome: Adverse effects · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.91, 1.1]1 study · 44 participantsLow
Medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²) vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (skin softening) · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsLow
Medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²) vs low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²)
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‒ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Narrowband UVB phototherapy vs medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²)
Primary outcome: Global improvement of disease activity or damage assessed by a medical practitioner or by participants · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head…
Interventions for morphea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsLow
Clarithromycin vs placebo
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Erythromycin vs placebo
Reduction in itch score within 2 weeks as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsModerate
Erythromycin vs placebo
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks as rated by a medical practitioner · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 4.02 [0.28, 56.61]2 studies · 86 participantsLow
Erythromycin vs placebo
Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment: Gastrointestinal upset. · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 2 [0.2, 20.04]1 study · 34 participantsModerate
Azithromycin vs placebo or vitamins
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Azithromycin vs placebo or vitamins
Serious adverse events, i.e. serious enough to require withdrawal of the treatment · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 119 participantsModerate
Azithromycin vs placebo or vitamins
The proportion of participants with resolution of itch within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.28, 2.48]1 study · 70 participantsModerate
Azithromycin vs placebo or vitamins
Reduction in itch score within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsModerate
Azithromycin vs placebo or vitamins
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks as rated by a medical practitioner. · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.52, 2]2 studies · 119 participantsLow
Azithromycin vs placebo or vitamins
Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment: Mild abdominal pain. · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 5.82 [0.72, 47.1]2 studies · 119 participantsModerate
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clarithromycin vs placebo
Serious adverse events, i.e. serious enough to require withdrawal of the treatment · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsModerate
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
Serious adverse events, i.e. serious enough to require withdrawal of the treatment · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 141 participantsModerate
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
Proportion of participants with resolution of itch within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.34 [0.12, 0.94]1 study · 21 participantsModerate
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
Reduction in itch score within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by a medical practitioner · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 2.45 [1.33, 4.53]3 studies · 141 participantsModerate
Acyclovir vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment
Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.01, 7.02]3 studies · 141 participantsModerate
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine
Serious adverse events, i.e. serious enough to require withdrawal of the treatment · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsLow
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine
The proportion of participants with resolution of itch within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 4.5 [1.22, 16.62]1 study · 24 participantsLow
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine
Reduction in itch score within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsLow
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by a medical practitioner · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clarithromycin vs placebo
The proportion of participants with resolution of itch within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.47, 1.52]1 study · 28 participantsModerate
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine
Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment: Headache. · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 7 [0.4, 122.44]1 study · 24 participantsLow
Acyclovir vs erythromycin
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acyclovir vs erythromycin
Serious adverse events, i.e. serious enough to require withdrawal of the treatment · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsModerate
Acyclovir vs erythromycin
The proportion of participants with resolution of itch within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
RR 13.22 [0.91, 192.02]1 study · 14 participantsLow
Acyclovir vs erythromycin
Reduction in itch score within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acyclovir vs erythromycin
The proportion of participants with good or excellent rash improvement within 2 weeks, as rated by a medical practitioner · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsLow
Acyclovir vs erythromycin
Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsLow
Clarithromycin vs placebo
Reduction in itch score within 2 weeks, as rated by the participant · pityriasis rosea
Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies