Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

510 questions · 533 findings · 60 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 153 · 28.7%GRADE not reported 18 · 3.4%Very low 134 · 25.1%Low 123 · 23.1%Moderate 80 · 15%High 25 · 4.7%

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Clinical improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Clinical improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Histological improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

It is very uncertain whether mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg changes histological improvement at 12 weeks (dichotomous) compared with mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.14 [0.79, 5.79]
1 study · 39 participants
Very low

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Histological improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Withdrawals due to adverse events · active EoE pediatric patients

It is very uncertain whether mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg changes withdrawals due to adverse events at 8 weeks compared with mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.32 [0.04, 2.79]
1 study · 39 participants
Very low

Corticosteroids vs placebo

Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · inactive EoE patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Clinical improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Clinical improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Histological improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

It is very uncertain whether mepolizumab 10 mg/kg changes histological improvement at 12 weeks (dichotomous) compared with mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.56 [0.23, 1.37]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Histological improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg vs mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Withdrawals due to adverse events · active EoE pediatric patients

It is very uncertain whether mepolizumab 10 mg/kg changes withdrawals due to adverse events at 8 weeks compared with mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2 [0.2, 20.33]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Clinical improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Clinical improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Histological improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 64 participants
Very low

Corticosteroids vs placebo

Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · inactive EoE patients

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 240 participants
Very low

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Histological improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found