QoL · People with urological (prostate) and gynaecological (cervical) cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Mean GI symptom scores · People with urological (prostate) and gynaecological (endometrial) cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Physical well‐being SF‐36 Physical Component Summary Score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Immediately post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Physical well‐being SF‐36 Physical Component Summary Score 0‐100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Two‐months post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Psychological well‐being SF‐36 Mental Component Summary Score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Immediately post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Psychological well‐being SF‐36 Mental Component Summary Score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Two‐months post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Surgical excision versus laser vaporisationor other · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Laser vaporisation versus CUSA · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
The intervention showed no clear difference in laser vaporisation versus CUSA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Photodynamic therapy versus laser vaporisationand surgical excision · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
LEEP versus laser vaporisation and surgical excision · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Recurrence rate at 1 year · women with high‐grade VIN
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
Dietary modification probably leads to lower diarrhoea at end of treatment compared with no nutritional intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Change in weight (kg) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall quality of life change score ‐ up to 12 weeks' · Cancer survivors who have completed active cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall social functioning change ‐ up to 12 weeks' · Cancer survivors who have completed active cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall social functioning change ‐ 6 months' · Cancer survivors who have completed active cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall quality of life change score ‐ 6 months' · Cancer survivors who have completed active cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall anxiety change ‐ Up to 12 weeks' · Cancer survivors who have completed active cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall emotional well‐being/mental health change ‐ up to 12 weeks' · Cancer survivors who have completed active cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall fatigue change ‐ Up to 12 weeks' · Cancer survivors who have completed active cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review