Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

336 questions · 357 findings · 36 reviews

No studies found 65 · 18.2%GRADE not reported 16 · 4.5%Very low 87 · 24.4%Low 114 · 31.9%Moderate 60 · 16.8%High 15 · 4.2%

Alemtuzumab 12 mg vs interferon beta‐1a

Sustained disease progression‐free survival · adults with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Alemtuzumab 12 mg may leads to lower sustained disease progression‐free survival compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alemtuzumab 12 mg vs interferon beta‐1a

Adverse events, including serious adverse events Assessed by: number of participants with ≥ 1 event · adults with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Alemtuzumab 12 mg showed no clear difference in adverse events, including serious events Assessed by: number of… compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alemtuzumab 12 mg vs interferon beta‐1a

Number of participants with new or enlarging T2‐hyperintense lesions on MRI · adults with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alemtuzumab 12 mg vs interferon beta‐1a

Dropout · adults with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

It is very uncertain whether alemtuzumab 12 mg changes dropouts Assessed by: number of participants who dropped out compared with interferon beta‐1a (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alemtuzumab 24 mg vs interferon beta‐1a

Proportion of participants with relapse‐free survival at ≥ 12 months · adults with multiple sclerosis Interventions: immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs Comparator: placebo Outcome: withdrawals due to…

Alemtuzumab 24 mg may leads to lower relapse‐free survival compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alemtuzumab 24 mg vs interferon beta‐1a

Sustained disease progression‐free survival · adults with multiple sclerosis Interventions: immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs Comparator: placebo Outcome: withdrawals due to…

Alemtuzumab 24 mg may leads to lower sustained disease progression‐free survival compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alemtuzumab 24 mg vs interferon beta‐1a

Adverse events, including serious adverse events Assessed by: number of participants with ≥ 1 event · adults with multiple sclerosis Interventions: immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs Comparator: placebo Outcome: withdrawals due to…

Alemtuzumab 24 mg showed no clear difference in adverse events, including serious adverse events Assessed by: number… compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ocrelizumab vs interferon beta‐1a

Relapse · patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

Ocrelizumab probably leads to lower number of participants experiencing ≥ 1 relapse compared with interferon beta‐1a (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ocrelizumab vs interferon beta‐1a

Number of participants experiencing disability progression · patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

Ocrelizumab may leads to lower number of participants experiencing disability progression compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ocrelizumab vs interferon beta‐1a

Number of participants with any adverse events · patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

Ocrelizumab showed no clear difference in number of participants with any adverse events compared with interferon beta‐1a (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ocrelizumab vs interferon beta‐1a

Number of participants with any serious adverse events · patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

Ocrelizumab showed no clear difference in number of participants with any serious adverse events compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ocrelizumab vs interferon beta‐1a

Number of participants with adverse events leading to study discontinuation · patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

Ocrelizumab may leads to lower number of participants experiencing treatment discontinuation caused… compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ocrelizumab vs interferon beta‐1a

Number of participants with gadolinium‐enhancing T1 lesions on MRI · patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

Ocrelizumab may leads to lower number of participants with gadolinium‐enhancing T1 lesions on MRI compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ocrelizumab vs interferon beta‐1a

Number of participants with new or enlarging T2‐hyperintense lesions on MRI · patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

Ocrelizumab may leads to lower number of participants with new or enlarging T2‐hyperintense lesions… compared with interferon beta‐1a (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4)assessed as: CTCAE v3.0 compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review