Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,036 questions · 1,100 findings · 261 reviews

No studies found 160 · 14.5%GRADE not reported 188 · 17.1%Very low 270 · 24.5%Low 303 · 27.5%Moderate 139 · 12.6%High 40 · 3.6%

Rituximab vs placebo

Cancer · primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in cancer measured by clinical assessment over 28 months compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Mortality measured by clinical assessment over 12 months · primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in mortality measured by clinical assessment over 28 months compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Clinical relapse · relapsing multiple sclerosis

Rituximab as 'switching' may leads to lower relapse measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Serious adverse events measured by clinical assessment over 12 months · relapsing multiple sclerosis

It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes serious adverse events measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Common infections measured by clinical assessment over 12 months · relapsing multiple sclerosis

It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes common infections measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Cancer · relapsing multiple sclerosis

It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes cancer measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Mortality measured by clinical assessment over 12 months · relapsing multiple sclerosis

It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes mortality measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Clinical relapse · primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in relapse measured by clinical assessment over 24 months compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs placebo

Serious adverse events measured by clinical assessment over 12 months · primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in serious adverse events measured by clinical assessment over 28 months compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

The intervention showed no clear difference in initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

The intervention showed no clear difference in initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

The intervention showed no clear difference in initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs Non-fluoride resin-based sealant

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment · Patients of any age (11-40 years) receiving comprehensive/fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

For resin-based sealants, fluoride release did not significantly change WSL initiation (RR 0.71, wide CI); subgroup not separately GRADE-rated.

1 finding from 1 review

Sealant or coating agent (with or without fluoride release) applied to teeth with fixed appliances vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment · Patients of any age (11-40 years) receiving comprehensive/fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

The additional use of a sealant probably reduces the initiation of white spot lesions during fixed orthodontic treatment compared with no sealant (RR 0.70), but the certainty of evidence is very low.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment

The intervention showed no clear difference in initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Coating material (bonding material or sealant) WITH fluoride release vs Coating material WITHOUT fluoride release

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment · Patients of any age (11-40 years) receiving comprehensive/fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

Fluoride-releasing coating materials do not appear to reduce WSL initiation more than non-fluoride coatings (RR 0.84, not significant); certainty of evidence is very low.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride-releasing resin-based bonding agent vs Non-fluoride resin-based bonding agent

Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment · Patients of any age (11-40 years) receiving comprehensive/fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

For resin-based bonding agents, fluoride release did not significantly change WSL initiation (RR 0.97); subgroup not separately GRADE-rated.

1 finding from 1 review

The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs other local anaesthetic

Self- or observational assessment of intraoperative distress/pain/acceptance of treatment during provision of LA: pain-related behaviour (any disruptive behaviour/sudden reaction/movement) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review

Video modelling acclimatisation for LA vs Oral hygiene video

Self- or observational assessment of intraoperative distress/pain/acceptance of treatment during provision of LA: anxiety/pain experience (VAS, higher scores indicate worsened anxiety) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

Video modelling acclimatisation for LA may leads to lower self- or observational assessment of intraoperative… compared with oral hygiene video (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Counter-stimulation and distraction (combined) vs Conventional treatment

Self- or observational assessment of intraoperative distress/pain/acceptance of treatment during provision of LA (SEM scale, distress) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review