Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,971 questions · 9,849 findings · 853 reviews

No studies found 1,150 · 11.7%GRADE not reported 3,387 · 34.4%Very low 1,963 · 19.9%Low 1,809 · 18.4%Moderate 1,207 · 12.3%High 333 · 3.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Routine vaginal examination vs routine rectal examination

Augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · pregnant women in labour at term

It is very uncertain whether routine vaginal examination changes augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: 307(1 RCT) compared with routine rectal examination (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review