Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,325 questions in 34 reviews · Oral medicine and oral cancer

current versions
No studies 164 · 12.4%Ungraded 841 · 63.5%Very low 209 · 15.8%Low 72 · 5.4%Moderate 38 · 2.9%High 1 · 0.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Herbal extracts (tea components; Chinese herbal mixture; freeze-dried black raspberry gel) vs Placebo or no treatment
Safety of the intervention (adverse effects) · People with a diagnosis of oral leukoplakia · up to 3 months
Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia to prevent oral cancer (2016) · Cochrane
SoF 4, Safety of the intervention up to 3 months: '3 studies measured adverse effects: green tea extract capsules caused high frequency (93%) of adverse effects of varying severity in 1 study; the mixed tea study did…3 studiesUngraded
Paroxetine (antidepressant, 20 mg/day) vs Placebo
Relief of burning/discomfort (symptom relief; pain intensity) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
Bogetto 1999 (paroxetine) included but data not presented (79% placebo-arm attrition).1 studyUngraded
Dietary supplements (hypericum perforatum / St John's Wort) vs Placebo
Change in quality of life (QoL) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months), hypericum perforatum
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
Sardella 2008 (43 participants) evaluated QoL from patient self-reports and narratively indicated that both intervention and placebo participants were better able to cope at trial completion.1 study · 43 participantsUngraded
Physical barriers (tongue protector) vs Placebo
Change in feeling of dryness · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF7: No included studies reported change in feeling of dryness.0 studiesNo studies
Dietary supplements (lycopene) vs Placebo
Change in quality of life (QoL) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months), lycopene
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
MD 0.93 [-3.14, 5.00]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Benzodiazepines (topical clonazepam) vs Placebo
Adverse effects: euphoric behaviour · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months), topical clonazepam
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
RR 3.00 [0.13, 70.16]1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Topical treatments (topical urea 10%) vs Placebo
Change in taste · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months), topical urea 10%
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF9. Change in taste short-term (Quantitative Sensory Testing gustative threshold): single study narratively reported no difference in short-term gustation thresholds; 38 participants (1 RCT, topical urea); very low.1 study · 38 participantsVery low
Electromagnetic radiation (low-level laser therapy) vs Placebo
Change in feeling of dryness · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF6: No included study reported change in feeling of dryness.0 studiesNo studies
Removal of predisposing habits (e.g. tobacco/alcohol cessation) vs Placebo or no treatment
Outcome NR · People with a diagnosis of oral leukoplakia
Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia to prevent oral cancer (2016) · Cochrane
'...nor did we identify any RCTs of risk factor cessation.' Removal of predisposing habits (e.g. smoking cessation) was a planned intervention; no eligible RCT found.NRNo studies
Physical barriers (tongue protector) vs Placebo
Change in quality of life (QoL) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
MD -9.20 [-26.90, 8.50]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Dietary supplements (alpha lipoic acid +/- adjunctive ingredients) vs Placebo
Adverse effects: headache · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
RR 10.87 [1.36, 87.03]2 studies · 118 participantsVery low
Vitamin A or retinoids (systemic or topical; incl. 13-cis-retinoic acid, acitretin) vs Placebo or no treatment
Safety of the intervention (adverse effects) · People with a diagnosis of oral leukoplakia · 4 to 12 months
Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia to prevent oral cancer (2016) · Cochrane
SoF 1, Safety of the intervention at 4 to 12 months: '3 studies (1 each evaluating topical acitretin, topical 13-cis-retinoic acid, 200,000 IU per week of vitamin A) found no adverse effects. Systemic 13-cis-retinoic…4 studiesUngraded
Bowman-Birk inhibitor vs Placebo or no treatment
Safety of the intervention (adverse effects) · People with a diagnosis of oral leukoplakia · up to 6 months
Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia to prevent oral cancer (2016) · Cochrane
SoF 6, Safety of the intervention up to 6 months: 'Trial authors reported that there were no significant adverse effects. 33 participants in the intervention group reported 75 adverse effects. 25 participants in the…1 studyUngraded
Electromagnetic radiation (low-level laser therapy) vs Placebo
Adverse effects · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF6: No included study reported the occurrence of adverse events.0 studiesNo studies
Physical barriers (tongue protector) vs Placebo
Change in QoL - depression (surrogate marker) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
MD -0.64 [-3.98, 2.70]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Anticonvulsants (gabapentin) vs Placebo
Change in feeling of dryness · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF2: No included studies reported change in feeling of dryness.0 studiesNo studies
Dietary supplements (lycopene) vs Placebo
Change in QoL - anxiety (surrogate marker) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months), lycopene
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
MD -2.85 [-5.28, -0.42]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Dietary supplements (alpha lipoic acid) vs Placebo
Change in taste · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF5: No included studies reported change in taste.0 studiesNo studies
Antidepressants (trazodone) vs Placebo
Change in feeling of dryness · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF1: No included studies reported change in feeling of dryness.0 studiesNo studies
Benzodiazepines (systemic clonazepam) vs Placebo
Change in taste · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months), systemic clonazepam
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
MD -1.00 [-3.11, 1.11]1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Dietary supplements (alpha lipoic acid +/- vitamins) vs Placebo
Relief of burning/discomfort (symptom relief; pain intensity) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · long-term (>3 to 6 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
MD -0.89 [-2.37, 0.59]2 studies · 94 participantsVery low
Anticonvulsants (gabapentin 300 mg/day + alpha lipoic acid 600 mg/day) vs Placebo
Relief of burning/discomfort (symptom relief; pain intensity) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months), gabapentin with adjunctive ALA
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF2 subgroup. Gabapentin + adjunctive ALA vs placebo forms one of two subgroups of the anticonvulsant symptom-relief estimate (RR 4.00, 2.09 to 7.67); no between-subgroup difference vs gabapentin alone; 100…1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Electromagnetic radiation (low-level laser therapy) vs Placebo
Change in taste · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF6: No included study reported change in taste.0 studiesNo studies
Antidepressants (trazodone 200 mg/day) vs Placebo
Change in quality of life (QoL) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
SoF1. Change in QoL short-term (mean Beck Depression Inventory, 0-63, lower better): this single study narratively reported that both intervention and placebo participants were less depressed at trial completion, but…1 study · 37 participantsVery low
Systemic beta carotene or carotenoids (incl. lycopene) vs Placebo or no treatment
Clinical resolution (oral lesion not completely resolved) · People with a diagnosis of oral leukoplakia · 5 to 12 months
Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia to prevent oral cancer (2016) · Cochrane
SoF 2, Clinical resolution (not completely resolved) at 5 to 12 months: 'The 3 studies could not be combined in meta-analysis. 2 found benefit for systemic beta carotene, and 1 did not.' No GRADE rating. Effects text…3 studiesUngraded
Topical treatments (capsaicin oral rinse) vs Placebo
Relief of burning/discomfort (symptom relief; pain intensity) · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · long-term (>3 to 6 months), capsaicin oral rinse
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
MD -2.60 [-5.11, -0.09]1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Dietary supplements (alpha lipoic acid +/- adjunctive ingredients) vs Placebo
Adverse effects: increase in blood pressure · People with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), that is, oral mucosal pain with no dental or medical cause for such… · short-term (up to 3 months)
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.07, 14.85]1 study · 38 participantsVery low
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Moderate to severe chills (BCG-CWP, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 11.00 [0.67, 179.29]1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Skin toxicity (lapatinib, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2.02 [1.23, 3.32]1 study · 67 participantsUngraded
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Gastrointestinal complaints (gefitinib, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.98, 1.11]1 study · 226 participantsUngraded
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Placebo
Xerostomia (subjective dry mouth; positive response = >25 mm change in VAS score) · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Johnson 1993: positive response (>25 mm change in VAS score) in 25% of participants on placebo, 51% on pilocarpine 5 mg tds, 47% on pilocarpine 10 mg tds. LeVeque 1993: positive response in 7% on placebo vs 42% on…2 studies · 278 participantsUngraded
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Mucositis (all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Mucositis all grades: not estimable due to high heterogeneity (P=0.0009; I2=86%) between subgroups (cetuximab; nimotuzumab) and within cetuximab (I2=93%); 1417 participants, 3 studies. Table 3, row 1.6 (Ang 2014;…3 studies · 1417 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Oral mucositis (severe) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.20, 0.72]5 studies · 270 participantsModerate
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs High-dose leucovorin rinse
Oral mucositis (severe) · Patients with osteosarcoma (bone cancer) receiving high-dose methotrexate, vincristine and leucovorin
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Oral mucositis (severe). Not estimable - no participants had developed severe oral mucositis by the fourth day after chemotherapy when the data were reported (Zhang 2011, Analysis 4.3, subgroup 3.2); 81 participants in…1 study · 81 participantsUngraded
Parasympathomimetic drugs (choline esters, cholinesterase inhibitors) vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Gastrointestinal complaints (lapatinib, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 15.53 [2.18, 110.55]1 study · 67 participantsUngraded
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Skin toxicity (erlotinib, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 6.57 [3.60, 12.00]1 study · 191 participantsUngraded
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Skin toxicity/acneiform rash (cetuximab, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 6.56 [5.35, 8.03]2 studies · 1311 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Number of days of treatment with opioid analgesics · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
No studies in the 5FU subgroup assessed the number of days of treatment with opioid analgesics.0 studiesNo studies
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Disease-free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Recombinant interleukin-2 + surgery (De Stefani 2002)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
HR 0.66 [0.43, 1.02]1 study · 201 participantsVery low
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Progression-free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Monoclonal antibody + chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
HR 1.08 [0.89, 1.32]1 study · 891 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Quality of life · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Summary of findings 2 (melphalan/HSCT): Quality of life - '1 study assessed this outcome but the data are currently unavailable as the study report and analysis have not yet been completed' (Toro 2013; measured with…1 studyUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Adverse events · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Adverse events reported narratively: one study did not report adverse events (Askarifar 2015); another reported no serious adverse events (Toro 2013); the remaining two reported low rates of shooting pain from the…3 studiesUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Low-dose leucovorin rinse
Oral mucositis (severe) · Patients with osteosarcoma (bone cancer) receiving high-dose methotrexate, vincristine and leucovorin
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Oral mucositis (severe). Not estimable - no participants had developed severe oral mucositis by the fourth day after chemotherapy when the data were reported (Zhang 2011, Analysis 4.3, subgroup 3.1); 118 participants…1 study · 118 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy for 30 minutes vs Oral cryotherapy for 60 minutes
Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Adults with solid cancers receiving fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.36, 1.30]1 study · 178 participantsVery low
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Nausea/vomiting (rIL-2, grades >=3)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.40 [0.15, 77.34]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Progression-free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
HR 0.80 [0.51, 1.28]2 studies · 271 participantsVery low
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Participant satisfaction · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included studies addressed participant satisfaction (review-wide gap).0 studiesNo studies
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Placebo
Other oral symptoms (oral discomfort, dysphonia) · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Both studies assessed oral discomfort and dysphonia (Johnson 1993; LeVeque 1993); pilocarpine reported to improve associated symptoms of salivary gland dysfunction (oral discomfort, dysphonia). No pooled data.2 studies · 278 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Oral mucositis (mean severity on WHO 0 to 4 scale) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · Radiotherapy to the head and neck
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
MD -0.25 [-0.72, 0.22]1 study · 40 participantsVery low