Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

335 questions · 344 findings · 21 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

No studies found 95 · 27.6%GRADE not reported 22 · 6.4%Very low 48 · 14%Low 100 · 29.1%Moderate 55 · 16%High 24 · 7%

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer vs no intervention

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer showed no clear difference in acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: IMRT vs 3DCRT

Mean GI symptom scores (EORTC‐QLQPR25 scale; lower scores better) · People with urological (prostate) and gynaecological (cervical) cancer

Summary of findings: IMRT showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (EORTC‐QLQPR25 scale; lower scores better) compared with 3DCRT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review