Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

329 questions · 344 findings · 34 reviews · Gut

No studies found 31 · 9%GRADE not reported 6 · 1.7%Very low 101 · 29.4%Low 82 · 23.8%Moderate 86 · 25%High 38 · 11%

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Studies with gastric cancer participants in addition to eligible participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in studies with gastric cancer participants in addition to eligible… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… changes sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part compared with gastric carcinoma (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… led to lower sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Sensitivity analysis, only gastric cancer participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in sensitivity analysis, only gastric cancer participants compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… probably leads to lower sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part compared with gastric carcinoma (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Irinotecan vs non‐irinotecan‐containing regimens

Tumour response · people with advanced gastric cancer

Irinotecan may leads to higher tumour response compared with non‐irinotecan‐containing regimens (low certainty).

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

Irinotecan vs non‐irinotecan‐containing regimens

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · people with advanced gastric cancer

Irinotecan showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival ‐ Substitutive comparison compared with non‐irinotecan‐containing regimens (moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Docetaxel vs non‐docetaxel‐containing regimens

Overall survival ‐ Substitutive comparisons · people with advanced gastric cancer

Docetaxel showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ Substitutive comparisons compared with non‐docetaxel‐containing regimens (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Docetaxel vs non‐docetaxel‐containing regimens

Tumour response · people with advanced gastric cancer

Docetaxel probably leads to higher tumour response compared with non‐docetaxel‐containing regimens (moderate certainty).

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding