Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

477 questions · 520 findings · 39 reviews · Back and Neck

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 91 · 17.5%GRADE not reported 14 · 2.7%Very low 137 · 26.3%Low 149 · 28.7%Moderate 104 · 20%High 25 · 4.8%

MET plus any intervention vs other therapies plus that intervention

CI: Confidence interval · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

MET vs sham MET

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP)

1 finding from 1 review

Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 20 participants
Low

MET vs sham MET

Functional ability · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

MET vs sham MET

General well‐being · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

MET vs sham MET

Adverse events · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Pain NRS: scale from 0 to 100 (worse pain) · patients with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in pain NRS: scale from 0 to 100 (worse pain) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 265 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Pain NRS: scale from 0 to 100 (worse pain) · participants with low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 181 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Pain NRS: scale from 0 to 100 (worse pain) · participants with low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 151 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) · participants with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 149 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) · participants with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 151 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Function Patient Specific Functional Scale: scale from 0 to 30 (greater functional ability) · participants with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in function Patient Specific Functional Scale: scale from 0 to 30… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Mean difference 0.1
1 study · 87 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Function Patient Specific Functional Scale: scale from 0 to 30 (greater functional ability) · participants with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in function Patient Specific Functional Scale: scale from 0 to 30… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 87 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with low back pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Pain NRS: scale from 0 to 100 (worse pain) · patients with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in pain NRS: scale from 0 to 100 (worse pain) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 146 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) · patients with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 248 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) · patients with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in disability Multiple scales: scale from 0 to 100 (worse disability) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 146 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Function Patient Specific Functional Scale: used in a 11‐point scale from 0 to 10 (greater functional ability) · patients with low back pain

The intervention may leads to higher function Patient Specific Functional Scale: used in a 11‐point scale… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Mean difference 1.1 [0.23, 1.97]
1 study · 86 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Function Patient Specific Functional Scale: used in a 11‐point scale from 0 to 10 (greater functional ability) · patients with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in function Patient Specific Functional Scale: used in a 11‐point scale… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Mean difference 0.8
1 study · 86 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale from ‐5 to +5 (greater recovery) · patients with low back pain

The intervention may leads to higher global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Mean difference 1.5 [0.7, 2.3]
1 study · 86 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale from ‐5 to +5 (greater recovery) · patients with low back pain

The intervention showed no clear difference in global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pilates for low back pain 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Mean difference 0.7
1 study · 86 participants
Low