Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,476 questions · 1,535 findings · 101 reviews

No studies found 233 · 15.2%GRADE not reported 332 · 21.6%Very low 209 · 13.6%Low 343 · 22.3%Moderate 279 · 18.2%High 139 · 9.1%

Apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy vs chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy

Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae ‐ not reported · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy vs chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy

Specific adverse events: thromboembolic events ‐ not reported · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy vs chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy

Adverse events: hypertension · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer

Apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy may leads to higher specific adverse events: hypertension compared with chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platin‐based maintenance chemotherapy vs observation

Progression‐free survival · patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Platin‐based maintenance chemotherapy showed no clear difference in 3‐year PFS compared with observation (moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Overall survival (OS) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance showed no clear difference in overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · newly‐diagnosed EOC

It is very uncertain whether chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab changes progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance leads to higher any adverse event (grade ≥3) compared with chemotherapy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · newly‐diagnosed EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab probably leads to higher any adverse event grade ≥ 3 compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review