evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,752 questions · 6,648 findings · 688 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1,125 · 16.9%GRADE not reported 670 · 10.1%Very low 1,796 · 27%Low 1,685 · 25.3%Moderate 1,075 · 16.2%High 297 · 4.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Intervention not reported

TXA given intravenously and intra‐articularly at a total dose of greater than 3 g pre‐incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively · individuals undergoing planned hip or knee replacement surgery Interventions: antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid, aprotinin or…
1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo

Apixaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
3 findings from 1 review

Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo

Rivaroxaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
3 findings from 1 review

Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo

Dabigatran (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
3 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure vs tension‐free midline closure

Wound infection · pilonidal sinus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes wound infection compared with tension‐free midline closure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure vs tension‐free midline closure

Wound dehiscence · pilonidal sinus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes wound dehiscence compared with tension‐free midline closure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Proportion of wounds healed · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in proportion of wounds healed compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Recurrence · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in recurrence rate compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Wound infection · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in wound infection compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Wound dehiscence · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in wound dehiscence compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure vs conventional midline closure

Proportion of wounds healed · pilonidal sinus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes proportion of wounds healed compared with conventional midline closure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review