Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,587 questions · 5,761 findings · 495 reviews

No studies found 1,011 · 17.5%GRADE not reported 1,797 · 31.2%Very low 1,100 · 19.1%Low 1,052 · 18.3%Moderate 649 · 11.3%High 152 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Transdermal oestrogens vs oral oestrogens

Clinical pregnancy rate · women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes

Transdermal oestrogens showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy rate compared with oral oestrogens (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LNG‐IUS vs another combined low‐dose OCP

Uterine fibroid‐related symptoms (abnormal uterine bleeding, measured at 12 weeks, with the pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC); lower = better) · women with uterine fibroids
2 findings from 1 review

LNG‐IUS vs oral progestogen (norethisterone acetate)

Change in haemoglobin level from baseline · women with uterine fibroids
2 findings from 1 review

Video modelling acclimatisation for LA vs Oral hygiene video

Adverse effects · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review