Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of AMELX rs6639060 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.42-2.39) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 5.22 (95% CI 0.25 to 108.96).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 5.22 [0.25, 108.96]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.12 to 8.23).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.00 [0.12, 8.23]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.28 to 3.75).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.03 [0.28, 3.75]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.33).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Mixed (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.95 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.25).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.95 [0.40, 2.25]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.42 to 2.39).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.00 [0.42, 2.39]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 2.90 (95% CI 0.92 to 9.12).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2.90 [0.92, 9.12]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.99 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.23).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Mixed (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.99 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.86).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.99 [0.53, 1.86]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.98 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.10).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.89 (95% CI 0.04 to 22.53).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.89 [0.04, 22.53]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 2.87 (95% CI 0.35 to 23.23).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2.87 [0.35, 23.23]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 5.22 (95% CI 0.25 to 108.96).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.08 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.85).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.08 [0.63, 1.85]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 2.80 (95% CI 0.93 to 8.43).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2.80 [0.93, 8.43]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.90 (95% CI 0.23 to 3.63).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.90 [0.23, 3.63]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Poor oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) · Children aged 3-12 years
Lower maternal education was associated with poor OHRQoL (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.23; 4 studies; high heterogeneity; CI lower bound at the null; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.12 [1.00, 1.23]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.92 (95% CI 0.24 to 3.58).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Age group: Children (n=4) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.25).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.00 [0.80, 1.25]
4 studies
GRADE not reported