Oral misoprostol vs mechanical methods
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with mechanical methods (low certainty).
- RR 1.24 [0.87, 1.76]5 studies · 2886 participantsLow
Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with mechanical methods (low certainty).
LNG‐IUS probably leads to higher adverse events compared with endometrial ablation (moderate certainty).
LNG‐IUS may leads to higher treatment failure compared with endometrial ablation (low certainty).
LNG‐IUS showed no clear difference in satisfaction with treatment compared with endometrial ablation (low certainty).
Azathioprine may leads to lower death compared with methotrexate (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Azathioprine showed no clear difference in relapse compared with methotrexate (low certainty).
Azathioprine showed no clear difference in adverse events causing death or study drug discontinuation compared with methotrexate (low certainty).
Azathioprine may leads to lower severe adverse events compared with methotrexate (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Leflunomide showed no clear difference in relapse compared with methotrexate (low certainty).
Leflunomide showed no clear difference in serious adverse events* compared with methotrexate (low certainty).
Leflunomide showed no clear difference in infection compared with methotrexate (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: ECM changes change in weight (kg) compared with NECT plus cimetidine (very low certainty).