Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,411 questions · 2,571 findings · 265 reviews

No studies found 543 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 169 · 6.6%Very low 676 · 26.3%Low 731 · 28.4%Moderate 399 · 15.5%High 53 · 2.1%

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs any comparison

Mortality within the longest · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may leads to lower mortality longest compared with any comparison (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion

All‐cause mortality · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may leads to lower mortality compared with standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion

Proportion of patients receiving PRBCs · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) showed no clear difference in proportion of patients receiving PRBCs compared with standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion

Proportion of patients receiving FFP · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) showed no clear difference in proportion of patients receiving FFP compared with standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion

Proportion of patients receiving platelets · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) showed no clear difference in proportion of patients receiving platelets compared with standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion

Rate of surgical reintervention · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) showed no clear difference in rate of surgical reintervention compared with standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs any comparison

Proportion of patients receiving PRBCs · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may leads to lower proportion of patients receiving PRBCs compared with any comparison (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs any comparison

Proportion of patients receiving FFP · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may leads to lower proportion of patients receiving FFP compared with any comparison (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs any comparison

Proportion of patients receiving platelets · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may leads to lower proportion of patients receiving platelets compared with any comparison (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs any comparison

Rate of surgical reintervention · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) showed no clear difference in rate of surgical reintervention compared with any comparison (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs any comparison

Excessive bleeding events and massive transfusion · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) showed no clear difference in excessive bleeding events and massive transfusion compared with any comparison (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review