evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,320 questions · 4,561 findings · 388 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1,138 · 25%GRADE not reported 886 · 19.4%Very low 1,014 · 22.2%Low 849 · 18.6%Moderate 543 · 11.9%High 131 · 2.9%

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication

Health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer screening, cervical screening, voluntary medical male circumcision, HPV or HBV vaccination · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer… compared with non‐digital, targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

Health Service Utilisation · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health service utilization compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health behaviour change ‐ Oral contraception use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to higher health behaviour change ‐ Oral contraception use compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing compared with standard care or no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

SRH knowledge · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to higher SRH knowledge compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Resilience interventions vs controls

Resilience Measured by: investigators measured resilience using different instruments; higher scores mean higher resilience Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention · healthcare students, including students in training for health professions delivering direct medical care (e.g. medical students, nursing…
1 finding from 1 review