What do systematic reviews say?

Autogenic drainage vs spontaneous cough

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Autogenic drainage vs active cycle of breathing technique

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 44 participants
  Very low

Autogenic drainage vs conventional physiotherapy

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Autogenic drainage vs Cornet®

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Low

Autogenic drainage vs Flutter®

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Low

Autogenic drainage vs high frequency chest wall oscillation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Autogenic drainage vs intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (200 bpm)

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 4 participants
  Very low

Autogenic drainage vs intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (200 bpm)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Autogenic drainage vs intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (400 bpm)

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 4 participants
  Very low

Autogenic drainage vs intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (400 bpm)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Autogenic drainage vs spontaneous cough

• Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 14 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings ‐ AZLI vs placebo

• Antibiotic therapy for chronic infection with Burkholderia cepacia complex in people with cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 99 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings ‐ Prophylactic vs 'as required' anti‐staphylococcal antibiotics

• Prophylactic anti‐staphylococcal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 119 participants
  Low

Omega‐3 vs placebo

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation changes FEV1 % predicted compared with placebo (very low certainty).

• Omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation for cystic fibrosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 2 [19.11, 23.11]
  1 study · 17 participants
  Very low

Omega‐3 vs placebo

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation changes FVC % predicted compared with placebo (very low certainty).

• Omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation for cystic fibrosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 17 participants
  Very low

Sildenafil vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Etilefrine vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Ephedrine vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silboesterol vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: repaglinide vs insulin

Summary of findings: repaglinide showed no clear difference in FEV1 % predicted change from baseline compared with insulin (moderate certainty).

• Drug treatments for managing cystic fibrosis‐related diabetes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 112 participants
  Moderate