Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

258 questions · 261 findings · 20 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 81 · 31%GRADE not reported 4 · 1.5%Very low 146 · 55.9%Low 19 · 7.3%Moderate 9 · 3.4%High 2 · 0.8%

Intervention not reported

Retransplantation after start of therapy ‐ ribavirin vs.placebo · Participants with recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus.

1 finding from 1 review

Antiviral interventions for liver transplant patients with recurrent graft infection due to hepatitis C virus 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 77 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Retransplantation after start of therapy ‐ interferon vs.control · Participants with recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus.

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes retransplantation after start of therapy ‐ interferon vs.control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antiviral interventions for liver transplant patients with recurrent graft infection due to hepatitis C virus 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.67 [0.08, 33.75]
1 study · 12 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Serious adverse events ‐ Haemodilution versus control. · patients with liver resection.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cardiopulmonary interventions to decrease blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for liver resection 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Number requiring allogeneic blood transfusion ‐ Low central venous pressure (CVP) versus control. · patients with liver resection.

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number requiring allogeneic blood transfusion ‐ Low central venous… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cardiopulmonary interventions to decrease blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for liver resection 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.66 [0.42, 1.03]
3 studies · 177 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Number requiring allogeneic blood transfusion ‐ Haemodilution versus control. · patients with liver resection.

The intervention led to lower number requiring allogeneic blood transfusion ‐ Haemodilution versus…; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Cardiopulmonary interventions to decrease blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for liver resection 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.41 [0.25, 0.66]
3 studies · 233 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Red cell transfusion ‐ Low CVP versus control. · patients with liver resection.

1 finding from 1 review

Cardiopulmonary interventions to decrease blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for liver resection 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 135 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Red cell transfusion ‐ Haemodilution versus control. · patients with liver resection.

1 finding from 1 review

Cardiopulmonary interventions to decrease blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for liver resection 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 180 participants
Very low

Enteral immunonutrion with Supportan vs enteral nutrition (EN) with Fresubin

Immunological rejection episodes · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether enteral immunonutrion with Supportan changes immunological rejection episodes compared with enteral nutrition (EN) with Fresubin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 84 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous electrolyte solution)

Length of hospital stay after liver transplantation [days] · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous electrolyte solution)

Re‐hospitalisation [events per patient] · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous electrolyte solution)

Infections (overall) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube changes infections (overall) compared with no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.32 [0.04, 1.86]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous electrolyte solution)

Bacterial infection · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube changes infections (bacterial) compared with no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.41 [0.03, 3.15]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous electrolyte solution)

Infections (viral) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube changes infections (viral) compared with no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous electrolyte solution)

Intensive care unit length of stay after liver transplantation [hours] · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs no postoperative parental nutrition (conventional intravenous electrolyte solution)

Time to extubation (hours) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

Length of hospital stay after liver transplantation [days] · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

Days on ventilator · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

All‐cause mortality · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes mortality compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.7 [0.01, 60.29]
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

Putative side effects of treatment (e.g. vomiting and diarrhoea) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes side effects (vomiting, diarrhoea) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.68 [0.04, 11.17]
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

Infection (overall) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes infection (overall) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.07 [0.12, 8.75]
1 study · 24 participants
Very low