Intervention not reported
Long cephalomedullary nail (2 studies; 400 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes long cephalomedullary nail (2 studies; 400 participants)a (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Short cephalomedullary nail (34 studies; 6437 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes short cephalomedullary nail (34 studies; 6437 participants)a (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Condylocephalic nail (7 studies; 996 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes condylocephalic nail (7 studies; 996 participants)a (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
External fixation (1 studies; 100 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
The intervention showed no clear difference in external fixation (1 studies; 100 participants)a (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.37 [0.01, 10.26]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Dynamic fixed angle plate · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Static fixed angle plate (5 studies; 847 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes static fixed angle plate (5 studies; 847 participants)a (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Long cephalomedullary nail (2 studies; 400 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes long cephalomedullary nail (2 studies; 400 participants)a (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Short cephalomedullary nail (33 studies; 5380 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes short cephalomedullary nail (33 studies; 5380 participants)a (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Condylocephalic nail (6 studies; 847 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes condylocephalic nail (6 studies; 847 participants)a (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
External fixation (1 study; 100 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
The intervention showed no clear difference in external fixation (1 study; 100 participants)a (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.36 [0.73, 2.54]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Non‐operative treatment (1 study; 106 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
The intervention showed no clear difference in non‐operative treatment (1 study; 106 participants)a (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Total hip arthroplasty (1 study; 156 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures
The intervention showed no clear difference in total hip arthroplasty (1 study; 156 participants)a (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functional outcomes · children with displaced supracondylar elbow fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cosmetic deformity measured as presence of cubitus varus · children with displaced fractures
It is very uncertain whether surgical fixation changes cosmetic deformity measured as presence of cubitus varus compared with non‐surgical immobilisation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.2 [0.04, 1.09]
Studies not reported
Very low
Nerve injury · children with displaced supracondylar elbow fractures
Open reduction showed no clear difference in nerve injury compared with closed reduction position (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.3 [0.09, 1.01]
Studies not reported
Low
Major complications · children with displaced supracondylar elbow fractures
Open reduction may leads to higher major complications compared with closed reduction position (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 4.15 [1.07, 16.2]
Studies not reported
Low
Cosmetic deformity measured as presence of cubitus varus · children with displaced supracondylar elbow fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Functional outcomes · children with displaced fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found