Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Health‐related quality of life · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Any adverse events or complications · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Disease-free survival · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Failure to clear liver metastases · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Recurrence of liver metastases · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
All‐cause mortality · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Time to mortality (overall survival) · people with liver metastases
It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes time to mortality (overall survival) compared with conventional surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- HR 0.91 [0.39, 2.15]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs no block
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted17 studies · 958 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs serratus anterior plane block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block showed no clear difference in rates of block‐related adverse events compared with serratus anterior plane block (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1 [0.06, 15.59]2 studies · 110 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs pectoralis plane block
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 98 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs pectoralis plane block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 47 participantsGRADE not reported
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs quadratus lumborum block
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs quadratus lumborum block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs intercostal nerve block
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 131 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs intercostal nerve block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block changes rates of block‐related adverse events compared with intercostal nerve block (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.09 [0.04, 2.28]3 studies · 181 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs epidural analgesia
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 81 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs epidural analgesia
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsGRADE not reported
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs no block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block showed no clear difference in rates of block‐related adverse events compared with no block (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1 [0.4, 2.49]18 studies · 1045 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs placebo block
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted8 studies · 499 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs placebo block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block showed no clear difference in rates of block‐related adverse events compared with placebo block (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1 [0.29, 3.41]10 studies · 592 participantsLow