Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,097 questions · 3,266 findings · 631 reviews

No studies found 430 · 13.2%GRADE not reported 193 · 5.9%Very low 995 · 30.5%Low 904 · 27.7%Moderate 591 · 18.1%High 153 · 4.7%

Intervention not reported

Discontinuation of study drug due to adverse events · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The intervention probably leads to lower discontinuation of study drug due to adverse events (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Viral clearance at 14 days · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Admission to hospital or death · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The intervention may leads to lower admission to hospital or death (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Admission to ICU or death · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

All initial symptoms resolved at 28 days, and up to the longest · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Time to symptom resolution · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life up to 28 days and longest · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

SAEs during the study period · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The intervention may leads to lower SAEs during the study period (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Any grade TEAE · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The intervention showed no clear difference in any grade TEAE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Any grade TRAE · unvaccinated, non‐hospitalized people with mild symptomatic COVID‐19 (WHO scale 2 to 3) at high risk for progression to severe disease

The intervention probably leads to higher any grade TRAE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low dose naldemedine vs higher dose

Symptoms of opioid withdrawal in the medium term · people with cancer irrespective of whether receiving palliative care and with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Low dose naldemedine showed no clear difference in symptoms of opioid withdrawalfin the medium termb compared with higher doses (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low dose naldemedine vs higher dose

Serious adverse eventsg · people with cancer irrespective of whether receiving palliative care and with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Low dose naldemedine showed no clear difference in serious adverse eventsg compared with higher doses (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low dose naldemedine vs higher dose

Adverse events · people with cancer irrespective of whether receiving palliative care and with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Low dose naldemedine showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with higher doses (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lower‐dose methylnaltrexone vs higher dose

Laxation response: risk of spontaneous rescue‐free bowel movements in the short terma · people receiving palliative care irrespective of whether they had cancer with opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Methylnaltrexone lower dose showed no clear difference in laxation response: risk of spontaneous rescue‐free bowel… compared with higher dose (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review