Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,703 questions · 15,007 findings · 1,416 reviews

No studies found 2,881 · 19.2%GRADE not reported 1,551 · 10.3%Very low 3,111 · 20.7%Low 3,881 · 25.9%Moderate 2,669 · 17.8%High 914 · 6.1%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Antioxidants vs placebo or no treatment

Live birth rate per couple · patients with male subfertility

It is very uncertain whether antioxidants changes live birth rate per couple randomised compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antioxidants vs placebo or no treatment

Clinical pregnancy rate · patients with male subfertility

Antioxidants may leads to higher clinical pregnancy rate per couple randomised compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antioxidants vs placebo or no treatment

Adverse events ‐ Miscarriage · patients with male subfertility

It is very uncertain whether antioxidants changes adverse events ‐ Miscarriage compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antioxidants vs placebo or no treatment

Gastrointestinal adverse events · patients with male subfertility

Antioxidants may leads to higher adverse events ‐ Gastrointestinal compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Newly‐diagnosed EOC: PARPi monotherapy vs placebo (maintenance therapy)

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · newly‐diagnosed EOC

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Newly‐diagnosed EOC: PARPi monotherapy changes any severe adverse event (grade 3 or higher) (G3+ SevAE ) compared with placebo (maintenance therapy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi monotherapy vs placebo (maintenance therapy)

Overall survival (OS) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi… showed no clear difference in overall survival (OS) compared with placebo after chemotherapy (maintenance therapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi monotherapy vs placebo (maintenance therapy)

Progression‐free survival · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi… leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with placebo after chemotherapy (maintenance therapy) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi monotherapy vs placebo (maintenance therapy)

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi… may leads to higher any severe adverse event (grade 3 or higher) (G3+ SevAE) compared with placebo after chemotherapy (maintenance therapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Newly‐diagnosed EOC: PARPi monotherapy vs placebo (maintenance therapy)

Overall survival (OS) · newly‐diagnosed EOC

Summary of findings table ‐ Newly‐diagnosed EOC: PARPi monotherapy showed no clear difference in overall survival (OS) compared with placebo (maintenance therapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Newly‐diagnosed EOC: PARPi monotherapy vs placebo (maintenance therapy)

Progression‐free survival · newly‐diagnosed EOC

Summary of findings table ‐ Newly‐diagnosed EOC: PARPi monotherapy may leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with placebo (maintenance therapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intratympanic corticosteroids vs no treatment or versus placebo

Change in hearing threshold determined by PTA Range 0 dB to 140 dB Negative values represent lowering and positive values represent raising of the hearing threshold. A lower hearing threshold represents hearing improvement. Â · sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Intratympanic corticosteroids showed no clear difference in change in hearing threshold determined by PTA Range 0 dB to 140 dB… compared with no treatment or versus placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review