Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,359 questions · 2,491 findings · 249 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 696 · 27.9%GRADE not reported 213 · 8.6%Very low 611 · 24.5%Low 595 · 23.9%Moderate 315 · 12.6%High 61 · 2.4%

Intervention not reported

Survival · ovarian carcinoma

1 finding from 1 review

Antigen‐specific active immunotherapy for ovarian cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 1882 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Antigen‐specific immunogenicity (humoral response) · ovarian carcinoma

1 finding from 1 review

Antigen‐specific active immunotherapy for ovarian cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
25 studies · 1521 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Antigen‐specific immunogenicity (cellular response) · ovarian carcinoma

1 finding from 1 review

Antigen‐specific active immunotherapy for ovarian cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
40 studies · 966 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses vs monofocal computer glasses

Asthenopia (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 186 participants
Low

Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs bifocal computer lenses

Headache (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) · computer workers

It is very uncertain whether progressive computer glasses with far distance focus changes headache (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) compared with bifocal computer lenses (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.43 [0.27, 7.55]
1 study · 36 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs bifocal computer lenses

Nausea (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) · computer workers

It is very uncertain whether progressive computer glasses with far distance focus changes nausea (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) compared with bifocal computer lenses (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [0.68, 2.45]
1 study · 8 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs bifocal computer lenses

Dizziness (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) · computer workers

It is very uncertain whether progressive computer glasses with far distance focus changes dizziness (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) compared with bifocal computer lenses (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.25, 4]
1 study · 8 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs trifocal computer glasses

Asthenopia (eyestrain severity) Likert scale 0 to 10 3 weeks · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs trifocal computer glasses

Asthenopia (eyestrain frequency) Likert scale 0 to 10 3 weeks' · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs monofocal computer glasses

Asthenopia (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 64 participants
Low

Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs monofocal computer glasses

Headache · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 64 participants
Very low

Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses

Asthenopia, summed score scale 1 to 140 3 weeks' · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses

Asthenopia Change score 3 weeks' · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses

Eyestrain (yes/no) · computer workers

It is very uncertain whether computer glasses changes eyestrain (yes/no) compared with ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.67, 1.34]
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses vs monofocal computer glasses

Headache · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 186 participants
Low

Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses

Headache · computer workers

It is very uncertain whether computer glasses changes headache (yes/no) compared with ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.92 [0.52, 1.63]
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses

Upset stomach (yes/no) · computer workers

It is very uncertain whether computer glasses changes upset stomach (yes/no) compared with ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.5 [0.14, 1.79]
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs progressive glasses

Asthenopia (two different scales), Short term · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 58 participants
Low

Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs progressive glasses

Asthenopia Medium term · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 35 participants
Low

Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs progressive glasses

Headache · computer workers

1 finding from 1 review

Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 23 participants
Low