Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether prevention of eclampsia: IV maintenance changes death of the baby before discharge: stillbirth compared with standard IM maintenance regimen (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The pooled mean dmft was 2.95 (95% CI 1.86-4.67), with very high heterogeneity (I2=99.7%).
Prevention of eclampsia: loading dose alone showed no clear difference in eclampsia compared with loading dose + maintenance regimen (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Prevention of eclampsia: loading dose alone showed no clear difference in death of the baby before discharge: perinatal death compared with loading dose + maintenance regimen (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether prevention of eclampsia: loading dose alone changes death of the baby before discharge: stillbirth compared with loading dose + maintenance regimen (very low certainty).
Prevention of eclampsia: loading dose alone showed no clear difference in neonatal death compared with loading dose + maintenance regimen (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) probably leads to lower respiratory failure compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (moderate certainty).
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) probably leads to lower need for endotracheal tube ventilation compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (moderate certainty).
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in mortality during study period compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may leads to lower chronic lung disease compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in pneumothorax compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III/IV) compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).