Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

266 questions · 269 findings · 41 reviews · Eyes and Vision

No studies found 85 · 31.6%GRADE not reported 3 · 1.1%Very low 62 · 23%Low 70 · 26%Moderate 46 · 17.1%High 3 · 1.1%

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Vision‐related patient‐reported outcome measurement at 6 months (the greater the score, the better) · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Clinical measures, such as reading speed or reading acuity at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Technical difficulties · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes technical difficulties with the intervention at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Device abandonment rate at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes device abandonment rate at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Iridotomy vs no iridotomy

Need for additional surgery: proportion of participants who received additional surgery to control IOP at 1 year · people with primary angle‐closure suspect

Iridotomy showed no clear difference in need for additional surgery: proportion of participants who received… compared with no iridotomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Undercorrected vs fully corrected spectacles · children with myopia (nearsightedness)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Systemic 7‐methylxanthine vs placebo · children with myopia (nearsightedness)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Atropine plus multifocal spectacles vs placebo plus SVLs · children with myopia (nearsightedness)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Atropine plus bifocal spectacles vs cyclopentolate plus SVLs · children with myopia (nearsightedness)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Bifocal spectacles vs SVLs with timolol drops · children with myopia (nearsightedness)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Tropicamide plus bifocal spectacles vs SVLs · children with myopia (nearsightedness)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Comparison (intervention vs comparator) · children with myopia (nearsightedness)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review