Enamel/dental hard-tissue changes and e-liquid cariogenic properties (demineralization, colour change, pH, sugar content, metals) · Oral bacteria (streptococci), dental hard tissue (enamel/dentin) and e-liquids studied in vitro/ex vivo (with a few clinical microbiome…
In vitro evidence suggests e-liquids are often acidic and sugar-containing and can alter enamel/dentin colour and properties, supporting a plausible cariogenic effect, but findings are heterogeneous and not pooled (ungraded, narrative).
1 finding from 1 review
Cariogenic and commensal oral bacteria (S. mutans and commensal streptococci growth, adhesion, biofilm) · Oral bacteria (streptococci), dental hard tissue (enamel/dentin) and e-liquids studied in vitro/ex vivo (with a few clinical microbiome…
Most in vitro studies indicate e-cigarette aerosol/e-liquid (especially flavored/high-concentration) disrupts normal oral flora and favors cariogenic S. mutans growth and biofilm, plausibly increasing caries risk; not pooled (ungraded, narrative).
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration survival · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Multi-surface ART restorations had a reported survival rate of 73% at 1 year.
4 findings from 1 review
Survival rate 73
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival rate 95
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival rate 59
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Show 1 more finding
Survival rate 91
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Restoration failure · Children (2-9 years) with caries in posterior primary teeth
Single-surface ART restorations had a low reported mean annual failure rate (about 5%; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration survival · Children with occlusoproximal caries in primary teeth
Multiple reviews reported similar restoration survival for ART versus conventional restorations in occlusoproximal cavities (ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Success or failure of restoration (as defined by the USPHS criteria) · Children with carious primary teeth
ART with high-viscosity GIC and amalgam had similar class I restoration success at 24 months (ungraded).
2 findings from 1 review
RR 1.07 [0.91, 1.27]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
RR 0.93 [0.83, 1.06]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Restoration survival · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Single-surface ART/HVGIC restorations had high reported survival (86% at 3 years), significantly higher than multi-surface restorations (ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Survival rate (%) 86
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Restoration survival · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations had lower reported survival (49% at 3 years) than single-surface restorations (ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Survival rate (%) 49
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Restoration failure · Children (2-9 years) with caries in posterior primary teeth
Multi-surface ART restorations had a high reported mean annual failure rate (17%; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration survival · Children with occlusoproximal caries in primary teeth
The reported pooled ART success estimate was 1.04.
1 finding from 1 review
Discomfort associated with the procedure · People with dental caries in primary teeth (mainly children)
The reported estimate for discomfort with ART versus conventional treatment was inconclusive (ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review