Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.42 to 2.39).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.00 [0.42, 2.39]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Dental caries in permanent teeth · Children (permanent dentition) worldwide
In Europe, the pooled prevalence of permanent-teeth caries in children was 44.1% (95% CI 36.1 to 52.5); certainty not graded.
1 finding from 1 review
Development of >=1 new carious lesion (caries incidence) · Patients with drooling (sialorrhea) due to neurological disease
In one RCT, BoNT-B 2500 U was not associated with a statistically significant increase in new caries versus placebo (RR 2.4, 95% CI 0.48 to 11.80; not significant).
2 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 2.90 (95% CI 0.92 to 9.12).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2.90 [0.92, 9.12]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
LTF rs11716497 showed no significant association with dental caries in a single study (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.21; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Dental caries in permanent teeth · Children (permanent dentition) worldwide
In Australia, the pooled estimate of permanent-teeth caries prevalence in children was 54.9% (95% CI 50.9 to 58.8) from a single study; certainty not graded.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.99 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.23).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Mixed (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.99 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.86).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.99 [0.53, 1.86]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.98 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.10).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
LTF rs11216477 was significantly associated with dental caries in a single study (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.89 (95% CI 0.04 to 22.53).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.89 [0.04, 22.53]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 2.87 (95% CI 0.35 to 23.23).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2.87 [0.35, 23.23]
2 studies
GRADE not reported