Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.75 [0.64, 0.87]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: corrosion
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.69 [1.12, 2.55]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss of dental hard substance adjacent to the restoration
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.12 [0.68, 1.86]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.53 [1.70, 3.78]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: corrosion
The intervention showed no clear difference in amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.28 [0.91, 1.81]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.82 [1.34, 2.46]
10 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7: non-stable (mobile) restoration
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 8.67 [5.32, 14.13]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.28 [1.69, 3.08]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.16 [5.32, 7.14]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.88 [4.77, 9.92]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.44 [0.71, 2.91]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8: disruption of occlusal integrity
The intervention showed no clear difference in amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.12 [0.66, 6.82]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8: disruption of occlusal integrity
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.39 [0.26, 0.58]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.29 [0.07, 1.21]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8: disruption of occlusal integrity
The intervention showed no clear difference in amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.88 [0.14, 5.56]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 7.62 [5.59, 10.38]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7: non-stable (mobile) restoration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 12.93 [8.77, 19.05]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 4.04 [2.03, 8.06]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7: non-stable (mobile) restoration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 18.59 [7.66, 45.10]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 4.71 [2.97, 7.49]
2 studies
GRADE not reported