What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Fee‐for‐service (FFS) vs existing payment methods

Unintended or adverse effects · healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings

1 finding from 1 review

Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Low

Fee‐for‐service (FFS) mixed with existing payment methods vs existing payment methods

Unintended or adverse effects · healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Enhanced fee‐for‐service (FFS) vs FFS

Unintended or adverse effects · healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pay for performance (P4P) plus existing payment methods vs existing payment methods

Unintended or adverse effects · healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings

Pay for performance (P4P) plus existing payment methods may leads to lower unintended or adverse effects compared with existing payment methods (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.77 [0.71, 0.82]
1 study · 362 participants
Low