Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 5 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 5 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Bulk-fill composite resin with 7-second dentine etching vs Bulk-fill composite resin with 15-second dentine etching

Treatment failure (annual failure rate) · Children (aged 5-8 years) with Class-II caries in primary molars, no pulp therapy

Etching dentine for 7 s rather than 15 s lowered bulk-fill composite failure (5.8% vs 16.9% annual failure) in one RCT; low quality of evidence (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
18 months (Cavalheiro 2020) · University (Brazil) · Dentine etching time (7 s vs 15 s)
Annual failure rate (%) 15 s 16.9%; 7 s 5.8%
1 study · 62 participants
GRADE not reported

Composite resin with etch-and-rinse (total-etch) adhesion vs Composite resin with self-etch adhesion (same universal adhesive)

Treatment failure (annual failure rate) · Children with moderately deep dentine caries in primary molars, no pulp therapy

Etch-and-rinse adhesion failed more than self-etch (19.5% vs 7.0% annual failure) in one RCT; low quality of evidence (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
18 months (Lenzi 2017) · University (Brazil) · Adhesive strategy (etch-and-rinse vs self-etch)
Annual failure rate (%) etch-and-rinse 19.5%; self-etch 7.0%
1 study · 44 participants
GRADE not reported

Selective caries removal (SCR) + composite resin vs Complete caries removal (CCR) + composite resin

Treatment failure (annual failure rate) · Children with deep dentine caries in primary molars restored with composite resin (indirect pulp treatment; pulpotomy only if pulp exposed…

Complete caries removal with composite resin had an annual failure rate of 6.8% in primary molars (single high-risk-of-bias RCT; low quality of evidence; not GRADE-rated).

2 findings from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth:… 2022 All outcomes
36 months · University, Brazil (Liberman et al. 2020 / Franzon et al. 2015) · Complete caries removal (CCR) arm
AFR 6.8
1 study · 48 participants
GRADE not reported
Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth:… 2022 All outcomes
36 months · University, Brazil (Liberman et al. 2020 / Franzon et al. 2015) · Selective caries removal (SCR) arm
AFR 17.1
1 study · 48 participants
GRADE not reported

Hall technique vs Compomer restoration or non-restorative caries treatment

Treatment failure (annual failure rate) · Children (aged 3-8 years) with 2-surface occluso-proximal dentine caries in primary molars, no pulp therapy

Preformed metal (Hall) crowns had a low reported annual failure rate (3.1%) versus compomer (14.7%) in one RCT; low quality of evidence (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
2.5 years / 30 months (Santamaria 2017) · University (Germany)
Annual failure rate (%) PMC Hall technique 3.1%; compomer 14.7%
1 study · 169 participants
GRADE not reported