Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

19 questions · 20 findings · 4 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 12 · 60%Low 8 · 40%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings table (subcomparison 2): second‐line chemotherapy or targeted therapy agent(s) plus control intervention vs control intervention

Toxicity · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (subcomparison 2): second‐line… changes toxicity compared with control intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (subcomparison 3): chemotherapy agent(s) plus control intervention vs control intervention

Toxicity · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (subcomparison 3): chemotherapy agent(s)… changes toxicity compared with control intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (subcomparison 5): chemotherapy or targeted therapy agent(s) plus control intervention vs control intervention

Toxicity · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table: chemotherapy or targeted therapy agent(s)… changes toxicity compared with control intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (subcomparison 5): chemotherapy or targeted therapy agent(s) plus control intervention vs control intervention

Toxicity · palliative participants with AC of the esophagus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (subcomparison 5): chemotherapy or… changes toxicity compared with control intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (subcomparison 5): chemotherapy or targeted therapy agent(s) plus control intervention vs control intervention

Toxicity · palliative participants with SCC of the esophagus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (subcomparison 6): chemotherapy or… changes toxicity compared with control intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐EGFR antibody plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Grade 3 to 4 diarrhoea · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether anti‐EGFR antibody plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Anti‐EGFR antibody plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Toxicity: grade 3 or 4 nausea ± vomiting · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

Anti‐EGFR antibody plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in toxicity: grade 3 or 4 nausea ± vomiting compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐EGFR antibody plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether anti‐EGFR antibody plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea ‐ seribantumab compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Grade 3 to 4 rash · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 rash compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Toxicity: grade 3 or 4 fatigue · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 fatigue compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone

SAEs and toxicity · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy (radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy changes SAEs and toxicity compared with chemoradiotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Toxicity: cardiac toxicity (any grade) · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in toxicity: cardiac toxicity (any grade) compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Toxicity: grade 3 or 4 nausea ± vomiting · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 nausea ± vomiting compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Severe adverse events and toxicity · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no clear difference in severe adverse events and toxicity compared with radiotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (subcomparison 4): targeted therapy agent plus control intervention vs control intervention

Toxicity · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (subcomparison 4): targeted therapy agent… changes toxicity compared with control intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review