Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
10 questions · 10 findings · 2 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 7 · 70%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 20%Low 1 · 10%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Foam surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
It is very uncertain whether foam surfaces changes time to pressure ulcer development compared with alternating pressure (active) air surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 2105 participantsVery low
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Foam surfaces vs reactive foam and gel surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Foam surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
It is very uncertain whether alternating pressure (active) air surfaces changes time to pressure ulcer development compared with foam surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyHR 0.41 [0.1, 1.64]2 studies · 2105 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces may leads to higher time to pressure ulcer development compared with reactive air surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyHR 2.25 [1.05, 4.83]1 study · 308 participantsLow
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found