Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 33.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Obturator medial‐to‐lateral approach vs obturator lateral‐to‐medial approach

Subjective cure · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Mid‐urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Obturator medial‐to‐lateral approach vs obturator lateral‐to‐medial approach

Subjective cure within 12 months · women with stress urinary incontinence

Obturator medial‐to‐lateral approach showed no clear difference in subjective cure (short term ≤ 1 year) compared with obturator lateral‐to‐medial approach (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mid‐urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.96, 1.06]
6 studies · 759 participants
Low

Obturator medial‐to‐lateral approach vs obturator lateral‐to‐medial approach

Subjective cure (medium term, 1 to 5 years) · women with stress urinary incontinence

Obturator medial‐to‐lateral approach showed no clear difference in subjective cure (medium term, 1 to 5 years) compared with obturator lateral‐to‐medial approach (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mid‐urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.91, 1.23]
2 studies · 235 participants
Low