evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment vs pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment vs pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review