evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

26 questions · 26 findings · 21 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 4 · 15.4%GRADE not reported 3 · 11.5%Very low 7 · 26.9%Low 4 · 15.4%Moderate 8 · 30.8%High 0 · 0%

Lower blood pressure targets vs standard blood pressure targets

Total serious adverse events · cardiovascular disease with high blood pressure

Lower blood pressure targets showed no clear difference in total serious adverse events compared with standard blood pressure targets (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SiT for maintenance/relief vs higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA

Patients with serious adverse events · Studies recruited adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with chronic asthma

SiT for maintenance/relief showed no clear difference in patients with serious adverse events compared with higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Serious adverse events during treatment · participants with alcoholic hepatitis at high risk of mortality and morbidity

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes serious adverse events during treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) vs usual care

Serious adverse events (falls) Median · older people at risk of poor health outcomes

It is very uncertain whether comprehensive Geriatric Assessment changes serious adverse events (falls) Median compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Participants with non‐serious adverse events: up to 3 months' · participants with alcoholic hepatitis at high risk of mortality and morbidity

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes participants with non‐serious adverse events: up to 3 months' (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review