Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

271 questions · 282 findings · 120 reviews

No studies found 54 · 19.1%GRADE not reported 16 · 5.7%Very low 81 · 28.7%Low 75 · 26.6%Moderate 39 · 13.8%High 17 · 6%

Usual care with ivabradine vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Rate of serious adverse events · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐serious systemic adverse events (all included studies) inactivated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 · patients with preventing hepatitis A.

The intervention showed no clear difference in non‐serious systemic adverse events (all included studies)… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐serious systemic adverse events (low risk of bias) live attenuated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 · patients with preventing hepatitis A.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐serious local adverse events (all included studies) live attenuated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 · patients with preventing hepatitis A.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐serious systemic adverse events (all included studies) live attenuated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 · patients with preventing hepatitis A.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Rotarix vs placebo

All serious adverse events · children

Rotarix leads to lower all serious adverse events compared with placebo (high certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

RotaTeq vs placebo

All serious adverse events · children

RotaTeq showed no clear difference in all serious adverse events compared with placebo (high certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy vs no intervention

Serious adverse events (N) · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes

Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (N) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review