Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 66.7%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

Secondary procedures

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous nephrolithotripsy changes secondary procedures compared with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.42 [0.02, 9.43]
1 study · 23 participants
Very low

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs tubeless mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

Secondary procedures

1 finding from 1 review

Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Very low

Shock wave lithotripsy vs mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

Secondary procedures

Shock wave lithotripsy may leads to higher secondary procedures compared with mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.5 [1.01, 6.2]
1 study · 212 participants
Low