ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs No comparator
Retention of sealant (complete or partial retention) · Permanent teeth
The pooled retention rate was 75% at 1 year.
5 findings from 1 review
- Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes1 year · School · partially and fully retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants in permanent dentitions, 1 yearSurvival percentage 75 [51, 91]3 studiesGRADE not reported
- Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes3 years · School · partially and fully retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants in permanent dentitions, 3 yearsSurvival percentage 72 [72, 86]2 studiesGRADE not reported
- Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes2 years · School · partially and fully retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants in permanent dentitions, 2 yearsSurvival percentage 82 [77, 86]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Show 2 more findings
- Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes5 years · School · partially and fully retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants in permanent dentitions, 5 yearsSurvival percentage 63 [56, 70]1 studyGRADE not reported
- Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes4 years · School · partially and fully retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants in permanent dentitions, 4 yearsSurvival percentage 68 [61, 75]1 studyGRADE not reported