Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth
At 6 months, ART had significantly higher treatment success than placebo (OR 16.18).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 16.18 [1.21, 215.73]
44 studies
GRADE not reported
Restoration survival · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Multi-surface ART restorations had a reported survival rate of 73% at 1 year.
4 findings from 1 review
Survival rate 73
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival rate 95
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival rate 59
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Show 1 more finding
Survival rate 91
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Restoration survival · Children with occlusoproximal caries in primary teeth
The reported pooled ART success estimate was 1.04.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration survival · Children with occlusoproximal caries in primary teeth
Multiple reviews reported similar restoration survival for ART versus conventional restorations in occlusoproximal cavities (ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth
At 6 months, the Hall technique had significantly higher treatment success than ART (OR 10.11; moderate certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
OR 10.11 [3.03, 33.71]
44 studies
Moderate
OR 6.15 [2.55, 14.83]
43 studies
Moderate
OR 5.13 [1.18, 22.38]
21 studies
Moderate
Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth
At 12 months, conventional restorations had significantly higher treatment success than ART (OR 2.10; moderate certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
OR 2.10 [1.17, 3.78]
43 studies
Moderate
OR 2.67 [1.24, 6.15]
44 studies
Moderate
Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth
At 12 months, the Hall technique had significantly higher treatment success than SMART (OR 4.36; moderate certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
OR 4.36 [1.13, 16.77]
43 studies
Moderate
OR 5.61 [1.36, 23.08]
44 studies
Moderate
Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with single-surface cavities
The pooled survival rate was 93% at 2 years.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities
The pooled survival rate was 41% at 2 years.
3 findings from 1 review
Survival percentage 41 [18, 67]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Survival percentage 86 [59, 98]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival percentage 77 [56, 92]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Restoration survival · Primary posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities
Multiple-surface high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations in primary teeth had moderate 2-year survival (62%, 95% CI 51-73%); evidence ungraded.
3 findings from 1 review
Restoration survival · Primary posterior teeth with single-surface cavities
The pooled survival rate was 95% at 1 year.
3 findings from 1 review
Restoration survival · Primary posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities
The pooled survival rate was 62% at 2 years.
3 findings from 1 review
Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with single-surface cavities
Single-surface high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations in permanent teeth had high 2-year survival (93%, 95% CI 89-95%); evidence ungraded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities
Multiple-surface high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations in permanent teeth had high 1-year survival (86%, 95% CI 59-98%); evidence ungraded.
3 findings from 1 review
Restoration survival · Primary posterior teeth with single-surface cavities
Single-surface high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations in primary teeth had high 2-year survival (93%, 95% CI 91-94%); evidence ungraded.
3 findings from 1 review