Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were tabulated by arm.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; both arms had 0% failure.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; the review described comparable survival.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; no bevel had twice the failure rate in the review narrative.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; the review reports this three-arm comparison but tabulates only compomer failure.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were 3.3% and 15%.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; etch-and-rinse had a higher tabulated failure rate.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; tabulated failure rates ranged from 0% to 2.9%.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; glass carbomer had the highest tabulated failure range.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; metal-reinforced GIC had the highest failure rate.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; the review states cavity conditioner did not improve success.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were tabulated.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; bilayer placement and nanofilled coating were described as improving survival.
1 finding from 1 review
Annual failure rate (%) 32.4%, 13.7%, 18.7%, 13.4% by insertion/coating arm
1 study · 208 participants
GRADE not reported