Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Epilepsy

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 3 · 50%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Responder rate (1‐ to 3‐month blinded evaluation period) · patients with refractory (multi)focal or generalized epilepsy

The intervention showed no clear difference in responder rate (1‐ to 3‐month blinded evaluation period) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) · adults with IQ > 70 with refractory focal epilepsy

The intervention showed no clear difference in responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) · adults with IQ >70 with refractory focal epilepsy

The intervention showed no clear difference in responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) · adults with refractory focal epilepsy (1 or 2 epileptogenic regions)

The intervention showed no clear difference in responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) · patients with refractory (multi)focal or generalized epilepsy

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes responder rate (3‐month blinded evaluation period) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Responder rate (1‐ to 3‐month blinded evaluation periods) · patients with refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy

The intervention showed no clear difference in responder rate (1‐ to 3‐month blinded evaluation periods) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review