Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 2 reviews · Incontinence

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Vaginal surgery with mesh vs non‐mesh repair

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with without mesh (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.36 [0.09, 1.4]
3 studies · 269 participants
Low

Any transvaginal permanent mesh vs native tissue repair

Prolapse on examination ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · vaginal prolapse

It is very uncertain whether transvaginal permanent mesh changes recurrent prolapse on examination (any compartment) compared with native tissue repair (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.42 [0.32, 0.55]
25 studies · 3680 participants
Very low

Transvaginal biological graft vs native tissue repair

Prolapse on examination ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · vaginal prolapse

Transvaginal biological graft showed no clear difference in recurrent prolapse on examination compared with native tissue repair (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.96 [0.71, 1.29]
9 studies · 1278 participants
Low