Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 6 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Erbium:YAG laser vs Air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow)

Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis

Er:YAG laser led to lower recurrence of peri-implantitis compared with air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
After 6 months no statistically significant difference for peri-implantitis recurrence; 11% of implants (five air-abrasive, six laser) had pus on probing.
1 study · 42 participants
GRADE not reported

Adjunctive local antibiotic (8.5% doxycycline hyclate, Atridox) added to manual debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel

Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
4 months (18 weeks)
No recurrence of peri-implantitis occurred in any of the groups.
1 study · 28 participants
GRADE not reported

Metronidazole gel 25% (local antibiotic) vs Ultrasonic debridement

Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 weeks
No recurrence of peri-implantitis occurred in any of the groups.
1 study · 27 participants
GRADE not reported

Air-abrasive / Vector system debridement vs Manual debridement (carbon fibre curettes)

Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
No recurrence of peri-implantitis occurred in any of the groups.
1 study · 11 participants
GRADE not reported

Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel

Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis

Er:YAG laser debridement showed no clear difference in recurrence of peri-implantitis compared with manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 0.25 [0.03, 2.06]
2 studies · 40 participants
GRADE not reported

Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier

Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis

Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) showed no clear difference in recurrence of peri-implantitis compared with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
4 years
RR 2.0 [0.21, 18.98]
1 study · 22 participants
GRADE not reported