Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 2 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measures · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measures · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conventional occlusion vs atropine penalization

Quality of life (different measures and time points reported in the included studies) Assessed at different time points (17 weeks or 6 months) by patient preference or the Amblyopia Treatment Index questionnaire. · Participants of any age with either unilateral strabismic, anisometropic, or mixed (strabismic‐refractive) amblyopia; deprivation…

1 finding from 1 review

Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 256 participants
Moderate