What do systematic reviews say?

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Higher bladder volume vs lower bladder volume

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Bile acid sequestrants vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 4.6
  1 study · 50 participants
  Low
• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 119 participants
  GRADE not reported
• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 2.4
  1 study · 76 participants
  Low

Counselling vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Counselling changes QOL scores (5‐point VAS; lower is better) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 152 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs no intervention

• Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 17 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Fitusiran prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy

• Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 103 participants
  Low